BlogGuide

Inside our LinkedIn review protocol

Inside our LinkedIn review protocol — GTM Street

When I review a LinkedIn outreach tool, I start with the job you need it to do. A tool built around templates might be just right for a small team. If you’re running an agency, shared campaigns and separate client workspaces may matter more. I want you to know whether a tool fits your work and which plan you’ll need to get the features you’re after.

Before we give it a score, we check the features against the vendor’s current sources and keep a dated record. We spell out whether a price is monthly or annual and whether it’s per person. You’ll also see which features come with the tool and which need an integration. If something costs extra, we call that out too.

What the ratings mean

A rating is our take on how useful a tool is for the people it’s built for. An 8 means it’s a strong choice for that work. A 9 means it covers that work exceptionally well or is a particularly good match for its buyer. It can still score well if you need a higher plan for some features, or if another tool handles part of the job differently.

We score seven areas, then combine them using the weights below. The overall rating is rounded to one decimal place.

DimensionWeightWhat we assess
Targeting20%Audience sources and prospect selection
Sequencing25%Campaign actions and follow-up control
AI Usage5%Available AI tasks and useful input context
API & MCP10%Actions available to connected software
Account Safety10%Activity settings and account access controls
Composability15%Integrations and team coordination
Versus15%Value compared with suitable alternatives

The Account Safety score covers the controls a tool gives you. It can’t tell you how likely an account restriction is, and it isn’t a security certification. When a limitation affects your decision, we account for it in the relevant part of the review. We don’t keep docking points across several areas for the same general risk.

Different buyers need different features

If you’re a solo founder, campaign features and value get more weight. For agencies, we put more weight on managing work across accounts. For revenue operations teams, integrations matter more. We use the same seven scores for each buyer, but change how much each one contributes to the rating.

DimensionSolo founderAgencyRevOps
Targeting20%15%15%
Sequencing30%20%20%
AI Usage5%5%5%
API & MCP5%10%20%
Account Safety10%10%10%
Composability10%20%25%
Versus20%20%5%

We give credit for features you can use on the plan we’re reviewing. If access is limited to a beta, we’ll explain who can use it. Something on the roadmap doesn’t count for as much as a feature you can use today. And reading the docs doesn’t count as a hands-on test. We don’t make up campaign results to fill the gap.

Spotted a price or feature we’ve got wrong? Send it through the corrections page so we can take another look.

Last updated on

LinkedInMethodology

Explore the tools in this category
All articles ↗